
Understanding Shielding Effectiveness
November 20, 2023Introduction
Shielding, or screening effectiveness, is essential to the safe operation of electric vehicles (EVs). There was a time when the noise generated by the spark plugs firing in an internal combustion engine caused an annoying buzz when listening to the AM radio. Circuit designs have since evolved, and this issue was eventually resolved, but now the issue is back. To drive the electric motors, EVs are switching over a hundred amps at 500 to 900 VDC at perhaps a 10 to 20 kHz rate. Here, the potential interference is more than an annoyance, it can affect the Automatic Driver Assistance Systems (ADAS) or other critical systems, which affects the safety of both the driver and the passengers. Controlling interference is therefore a critical requirement and understanding the shielding effectiveness of the transmission lines carrying power and data is essential to mitigating it.
Coaxial Cables
A coaxial cable passes RF current on both the inner conductor and the inside of the shield. The RF current on the inside of the shield is the return current flowing in the opposite direction and balances that of the inner conductor. No RF current should flow on the outside of the shield, as shown in Figure 1. Because of this balance, there should be no radiated RF energy. In practice, the shield is not perfect and may have gaps in the braid, and some RF current penetrates due to skin effect. Shielding effectiveness measurements are meant to determine the amount of this RF leakage.
Figure 1 – Coaxial Current Flow
The DC Drive Cables
The cables carrying the motor drive are the most significant contributor to this effect, and so should be carefully selected. A typical cable—Kromberg & Schubert PN 64997451 for instance—has a stranded copper core with 12.5 mm (0.49”) diameter covered by 0.8 mm of silicone insulation, followed by 0.2 mm of tinned copper braid covered with an aluminum foil. Finally, the braid is covered with 0.9 mm of silicone insulation for a total cable diameter of about 18 mm (0.71”). This is a particularly large cable, meant for high motor drive currents.
At frequencies up to 100 MHz, the characteristic impedance of this cable might be close to 2Ω, and smaller cables might range as high as 10 ohms. The shielding of such a cable is characterized in two ways. For lower frequencies—up to 100 MHz—where there is little change in phase along the length of the cable, the transfer impedance is evaluated, which is essentially a DC property. Above 30 MHz, the screening effectiveness may be evaluated to several GHz.
These cables are not designed to be RF coaxial cables, and as such, have a low cut-off frequency, where the TE11 waveguide mode can be active along with the desired TEM mode. Interference between the two modes due to differing velocity factors causes ripples in the frequency response which would find its way into a screening effectiveness measurement. The TE11 mode for a coaxial cable begins at:
Where the D terms are the diameters of the inner and outer conductors in meters, c is the speed of light in m/s, and µ and ε are the relative magnetic and dielectric constants of the insulating materials. For the Kromberg cable example above, fc is 4 GHz.
Let’s look at these two measurements in the following sections.
Transfer Impedance
The transfer impedance measurement is defined by IEC62153-4-3(Ed 2.0). A tri-axial fixture may be used to measure a Cable Under Test (CUT).
Figure 2 – Transfer Impedance Measurement
The transfer impedance is defined as the ratio of the longitudinal voltage developed on the shield of a CUT due to a current applied to its center conductor per unit length. At DC, this is equal to the resistance per unit length of the shield. Figure 2 shows the schematic of a tri-axial fixture to make this measurement. The tri-axial fixture has good high-frequency response and low susceptibility to external interference, but a ground-plane fixture may also be used.
For this fixture, the CUT is suspended above a ground-plane plate. The far end of the CUT may be shorted or terminated in its own characteristic impedance, Z1. Source impedance Z0 may be matched to the CUT characteristic impedance Z1 with restive matching network ZM1 and ZM2. The signal on the shield will be picked off the far end with series termination Z2 which matches the characteristic impedance of the shield/ground-plane combination.
Figure 3 – Ground Plane Fixture
Figure 3 shows the schematic for a ground plane fixture. Z0 is the impedance of the source, usually 50 ohms. Z1 is the characteristic impedance of the CUT and Z2 is the free-wire impedance of the shield to the ground plane beneath it. The transimpedance calculation is somewhat more complicated due to the matching resistors but is still V2 of the shield divided by I1 of the center conductor current per unit length.
For large distances, h between the shield and the ground plane compared to the diameter of the shield, Z2 is given by:
Where h is the height of the CUT above the ground plane and d is the diameter of the shield. Matching resistors Z1 and Z2 improve the frequency response of the fixture.
Shielding Effectiveness
The transfer impedance measurement is defined by IEC62153-4-4(Ed 2.0). Above 100 MHz or so, there will be more phase shift along the length of a cable and there is the potential for interference due to electromagnetic radiation (EMI). The radiation condition requires a conductor long enough or a frequency high enough to produce a significant phase shift from one end to the other, creating the tangential electric field component needed to generate a radiated electromagnetic wave. Shielding effectiveness applies to a cable which is greater than ten wavelengths long, or where guide velocity in the cable
and εr is the cable dielectric constant.
For common silicone insulation, with a dielectric constant of 3.5, a one-meter length is ten wavelengths at 1.6 GHz. Two meters for 800 MHz and so on.
Effective shielding can reduce EMI from a cable. The screening attenuation, expressed as a positive number, is defined by the ratio of peak radiated power Pr,max from the CUT generated by peak voltages on the screen to the input power P1:
Screening attenuation is measured in a tri-axial fixture, as in Figure 4 below.
Figure 4 – Triaxial Screening Effectiveness Measurement
The input matching circuit is a pair of resistors, a series followed by a shunt value to match the 50Ω source impedance, Zg of the Vector Network Analyzer (VNA) to the 1 to 10Ω characteristic impedance, Z1 of the CUT. The series resistor, Rs and shunt resistor, Rp may be calculated as follows:
The excess loss due to the resistive matching resistors is:
for 50Ω Zg to 9Ω Z1 this is -20.5 zdB
Terminating resistor R1 must equal the characteristic impedance of the CUT. Damping resistor R2 is required to dissipate oscillations of the inner structure which at some point will be a quarter wavelength resonator, grounded on the left-hand side. A 50Ω resistor would be prudent when the output is fed to a 50Ω VNA input. This resistor would produce another 6 dB of loss.
For our case of a CUT with 9Ω characteristic impedance, matching series resistor 45.3Ω, shunt resistor 10Ω, and a 50Ω damping resistor, the screening effectiveness may be measured directly by a VNA S21 measurement compensated by adding 26.5 dB to the result.
Determining the Characteristic Impedance of the CUT
There are two simple ways to determine the characteristic impedance, Z1 of the CUT. First, a sample of the cable should be cut to an eighth of a wavelength at some chosen test frequency, Ftest.
Where L is the cut length in meters, c is speed of light in m/s, and ε1 is the dielectric constant of the cable.
Measure the impedance of the cable from one end with the other end open, Zopen. Short the open end and measure again, Zshort. Then:
In a similar method, cut the cable a little over a quarter wavelength long at a test frequency, Ftest—which is a little over 40mm long for silicone dielectric with εr = 3.5 at 1 GHz. Terminate one end with 50Ω—perhaps using four 200Ω resistors—and observe the response using the Smith chart display on a VNA, as shown in Figure 5. Starting from a very low frequency to Ftest, the response will describe a clockwise circle starting at 50Ω and eventually crossing the real axis at some low value, R. Find this crossing point and compute:
Figure 5 – Smith Chart Measurement of Z1
For our 9Ω example, we have .
Conclusion
Two important cable measurements have been shown; Transfer impedance and shielding effectiveness. Both have broad implications for the automotive industry. As electronic systems continue to evolve, it is imperative that critical subsystems do not interfere with each other, particularly those that involve driver safety. A basic understanding of these measurements is important, and Copper Mountain Technologies furnishes Vector Network Analyzers to make them and meet the needs of the industry. Please feel free to visit our website at www.coppermountaintech.com to see our world-class products and avail yourself of the educational materials in our technical library, videos, and webinars.
Related Post

What is the Characteristic Impedance of a Coaxial Cable?
March 22, 2023
A coaxial cable is an RF transmission line which consists of a center conductor surrounded by a dielectric medium, a coaxial shield, and often an insulating plastic jacket. Figure 1 - Coaxial Cable The inner conductor of the coaxial cable possesses an intrinsic inductance per unit length L’ just like the wire in free space. By virtue of the coaxial shield and the dielectric material, it also has a capacitance per unit length C’. The inductance and capacitance are distributed along the length of the cable, as shown in Figure 4 below. Figure 2 - Inductance and Capacitance per Unit Length of a Coaxial Cable If the inductance and capacitance per unit length are known, then the characteristic impedance of the cable is given by: Low-loss dielectric materials such as PTFE are common. PTFE has a relative dielectric constant of 2.02 to 2.1, but this is commonly processed to create a PTFE foam with a significant amount of air, resulting in lower loss and a lower dielectric constant. RF travels through the coaxial cable at the guide velocity vg, slower than the speed of light, c: The relative velocity of propagation is expressed as the percentage of c or: This number is approximately 65% for solid PTFE cables, and as high as 90% for low loss foamed PTFE. An air-line coaxial cable with only air as a dielectric would have a relative velocity of 100%. The characteristic impedance of a coaxial transmission line may be calculated from: Where Douter is the diameter of the outer shield to its inner surface, Dcenter is the diameter of the center conductor, and ∈r is the relative dielectric constant of the medium in between the two. See this and more important radio frequency charts and formulas in this comprehensive application note.

Introduction to Copper Mountain Technologies' Multiport VNA
February 3, 2023
Introduction Modern RF applications are constantly evolving and demand increasingly sophisticated test instrumentation. 5G systems often have multiple channel outputs for beam-forming, and it is common to have multiple frequency bands aggregated into a single RF front-end sub-system. High-speed digital media often contain multiple balanced lines which might require testing. A 16-port VNA can completely test a cable with four balanced pairs for insertion loss, return loss, near-end crosstalk, and far-end crosstalk. A multiport vector network analyzer is a convenient tool to evaluate all these systems. The SN5090 Multiport VNA The SN5090 is a 9 GHz Multiport VNA, which may be ordered in 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, or 16-port configurations. Figure 1 - SN5090-16, 16 Port VNA Ports on this VNA may be grouped and calibrated separately. For instance, ports 1 through 4 might be grouped and calibrated from 1 to 2 GHz with SMA connectors, while ports 5 and 6 might be designated to make a 2-port measurement from 5 to 6 GHz with N connectors and so forth. Performing a full 16-port calibration requires performing an Open/Short/Load (OSL) 1-port calibration on each port, and potentially a thru calibration between every possible pairing of ports, or 120 pairs. The 1-port calibration is always required, but a mathematical shortcut may be employed to shorten the thru calibration to a total of fifteen thru measurements. This shortcut can be performed by connecting ports 1 to 2, 1 to 3, 1 to 4, through 1 to 16. The new user interface (UI) for the multiport VNA is logically organized, intuitive, and easy to use. Figure 2 - Multiport UI As with all CMT VNAs – except the M series – the SN5090 includes all of the advanced analytical features, such as time domain analysis and gating, at no extra cost. Applications Multi-channel RF systems are quite common in 5G applications. Beamforming requires a number of channels with amplitude and phase control. Figure 3 shows a six-channel system, which might need to be verified with a VNA. Figure 3 - Example of a 6-Channel System for Beamforming Measuring a system such as this with a 2-port VNA would be time-consuming, and if the end result needs to be a full 6-port touchstone file, this would have to be compiled from six separate s2p files. The testing of high-speed digital cables demands the use of a multiport VNA. An HDMI cable contains four balanced twisted-pair transmission lines. To measure the differential insertion loss, return loss, near-end crosstalk, and far-end crosstalk of all four pairs, connect each wire on each end to a different VNA port, for a total of 16 ports as shown in Figure 4. As USB-C evolves to even higher speeds and replaces HDMI, there will be an even greater need to verify the capabilities of the cables and connectors at higher frequencies. Figure 4 - Four Balanced Lines With appropriate fixturing, connectorized cables may be connected and quickly tested with automation, or with pass/fail limit lines set up on the VNA. Front-end RF modules with multiple inputs and upconverted/downconverted outputs are common in satellite communications systems. A multiport VNA can be configured to measure all inputs and outputs, potentially using one or more ports set to zero-span mode to generate fixed LO signals required by the module. Frequency offset mode may be used to measure the conversion efficiency of an upconverter or downconverter. It is often necessary to measure an array of DUTs. The 16-port VNA can make eight 2-port measurements, one after another. This may be needed for production testing or temperature testing of an array of DUTs, as shown in Figure 5, to ensure thermal compliance. Figure 5 - DUT Array Measurement Using a Switch Matrix instead of Multiport VNA A switch matrix may be used to multiplex the ports of a 2-port VNA to any number of ports. A full matrix switching system can connect each port of the VNA to any one of the output ports. This is the most complicated configuration and the slowest. Simpler configurations may only fan out ports 1 and 2 separately to multiple outputs, perhaps to make measurements of the two ends of a bundle of cables. Figure 6 shows a simple 8-way switch that could measure the A and B ends of eight cables. This cannot measure any coupling or interaction between the cables. Figure 6 - Simple 8-Way Fan-Out for 2-Port VNA Taking as an example when eight cables are being tested from 1A to 1B, 2A to 2B, and so on, this simple fan-out configuration would make 8, 2-port measurements in 16 VNA sweeps – one forward and one reverse measurement. That is 2N sweeps for N ports. N or 8 de-embedding files are required. If you need to measure from every port on the left side to every port on the right side, then the number of sweeps rises dramatically. For the case shown in Figure 6, this would require 2*(8x8), which is 128 total sweeps or 2N2 in general. N2 or 64 de-embedding files are required. Measurement time per point for a VNA is typically 1.5/IFBW worst case. For a 1,000 point sweep at a 10 kHz IF bandwidth, this is 150 mS per sweep. The simple (2N) fan-out would require 2.4 seconds to complete, and the more complicated switching (2N2) would require 19.2 seconds. An 8-port full matrix switch is shown in Figure 7. While SP4T switches are more common, you can also use SP8T switches. Here, either port of the 2-port VNA may be routed to any of the eight output ports. This has 8x7 possible switch positions, or N(N-1). A 16-port version of this would be required to perform the same task as the system in Figure 6, measuring eight cables end to end along with coupling and interaction between any pair. This would require 2(16*15) sweeps, or 480 sweeps, taking 72 seconds to complete. N*(N-1) or 240 de-embedding files would be required. Figure 7 - Full Matrix 8-Port Switch Multiport VNA Measurement The multiport VNA switches the stimulus signal from one port to the next while the receivers on every port are active simultaneously, as shown in Figure 8. The incident port is only relevant on the active stimulus port. Figure 8 - Multiport VNA Block Diagram Making the full 16x16 matrix S-parameter measurement only requires 16 switch states and 16 (or N) sweeps. This takes 2.4 seconds for 1,000 points in a 10 kHz IFBW, 30x faster than the full matrix switch approach. No de-embedding files are required, only the 16-port calibration. This is clearly the fastest and most accurate way to make a 16-port measurement, or even a 6, 8, 10, 12, or 14-port measurement. Switch Network vs Multiport Comparison While a switch matrix might be appropriate for a very simple measurement system, the complexity increases dramatically for a full matrix configuration. These complex switches can be painfully slow, as mentioned earlier. Additionally, the need for hundreds of de-embedding files, which may need to be re-generated from time to time, is a daunting prospect. The insertion loss through multiple switches reduces the dynamic range of transmission measurements and greatly affects the accuracy of reflection measurements. A one-way loss through the switch network of 10 dB becomes 20 dB for a reflection measurement. Most VNAs are only specified to 35 dB for reflection, so this would increase to 15 dB. In other words, it would be impossible to measure a DUT with 20 dB return loss with any accuracy. If the loss through one leg is 10 dB, then a transmission measurement would also see two of these losses, and the dynamic range would decrease by 20 dB total. Port-to-port isolation of typical RF switches can run from 45 dB to as high as 90 dB for a high-quality absorptive switch. The internal port-port isolation in the VNA is 140 dB or so, low enough that the leakage signal is below the receiver noise in a 10 Hz bandwidth. This reduction in isolation results in significant degradation of the measurement dynamic range. Mechanical switches have a limited lifetime, usually between 1 and 5 million cycles. In a production environment, this might not last very long. These switches also have a specified repeatability error which cannot be corrected and must be added to the overall uncertainty of the DUT measurement, with one added uncertainty per switch in the path. Conclusion The SN5090 Multiport VNA is a great solution for many applications. The speed, accuracy, and ease of use compared to a switch matrix has been detailed here. Please feel free to examine this product on our website along with our other VNA products and accessories.

Electrostatic Discharge Prevention
July 13, 2021
Electrostatic discharge is a potentially large problem for those working with fragile electronics. If not properly accounted for, it can cause expensive amounts of damage. Luckily, there are steps that can be taken to completely reduce the risks brought on by static electricity. By following the guidelines in this app note, a safe work environment can be created for productive electrical research and development.

A Guide to CMT VNA Software Families and VNA Series
February 14, 2018
Copper Mountain Technologies (CMT) provides a variety of Vector Network Analyzers (VNA) to accommodate a wide range of test and measurement needs. The CMT VNA family covers a wide span of frequencies starting from 20 kHz, and extending to 20 GHz, with 1-port, 2-port or 4-port configurations. 2-port VNAs are further divided into two groups: one capable of measuring 2-port 1-path measurements, and the other capable of full 2-port 2-path measurements.